1/18/2024 0 Comments Clean code pdf github![]() Therefore, as of now, Clean ABAP is an Open Source contribution: We came to the conclusion that this initiative gains its drive from its community, and that it needs to remain part of that community. Besides, many of you asked whether this would become available as a book, and whether we would be allowed to share it with our customers and partners. From the exchange with customer and partners, we know that there is a huge need for such kind of best practices. Through info sessions with many hundreds of participants, intense discussions, and great contributions, SAP colleagues helped turn this into a treasure trove for modern ABAPers. Martin and some other books contain many best practices around maintainable code.Some months ago Florian Hoffmann and me started an internal repository about best practices for maintainable and readable ABAP Code. In the interim, there may be further filings from either side.Having a code base, which is readable and maintainable is essential for sustainable development. ![]() Judge Jon Tigar has set September 14 as the first available date to hold a hearing on the motion to dismiss the case. And, consistent with this open source ethic, neither GitHub’s TOS nor any of the common open source licenses prohibit either humans or computers from reading and learning from publicly available code." Anyone is free to examine, learn from, and understand that code, as well as repurpose it in various ways. appreciates that code placed in a public repository is genuinely public. The companies maintain that because GitHub users decide whether to make their code public and agree to terms of service that permit the viewing, usage, indexing, and analysis of public code, then the site's owners are within their rights to incorporate the work of others and profit from it. Moreover, they contend that the plaintiffs "fail to allege any cognizable injury to them that would result from the mere training of a generative AI model based, in part, on code contained in Plaintiffs’ repositories." The plaintiffs made claims of unjust enrichment and negligence – under California state law – that the creation of Codex and Codex unfairly used their licensed code on GitHub.Īccording to the two companies, this is fundamentally a copyright claim and federal law preempts related claims under state law. Microsoft and GitHub also take issue with the complaint's assertion that the corporations are liable for creating a derivative work simply through the act of AI model training. ![]() ![]() Not even Dynamics 365 ERP is safe from Microsoft's Copilot splurge. ![]() Whose line is it anyway, GitHub? Innovation, not litigation, should answer.GitHub accused of varying Copilot output to avoid copyright allegations.Microsoft, OpenAI sued for $3B after allegedly trampling privacy with ChatGPT."The Section 1202(b) "is about identical 'copies … of a work' – not about stray snippets and adaptations," the defendants' motion says. That portion of the law forbids the removal or alteration of CMI – the software license details in this case – or the distribution of copyrighted content when it's known that the CMI has been removed. Thus, the pair argue that the plaintiffs' claim focusing on the functional equivalency of code does not work under Section 1202(b) of America's Digital Millennium Copyright Act. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |